At 3:25 PM -0400 10/6/06, Mike Woodworth wrote:
deprecate folderitem.count (but obviously keep it for old code)
define and *well* document that folderitem.item(0) returns the same
item as folderitem.item(folderitem.count)
now, we can start using folderitem as 0 based, old code continues to
run, and we can slowly build up a year or so of versions of RB which
will play well with code once .count is removed entirely.
Please...Don't even think of doing this.
Folderitem.Count makes absolutely the most sense, and replacing it
with the "off-by-one" monstrosity also known as Ubound is a major
step backwatds.
Regards,
Joe Huber
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>
Search the archives of this list here:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
