On 13/10/2006, at 6:13 AM, Massimo Valle wrote:
But, if you talk about a new compiler, I'd expect to see a smart optimized compiler and linker. Not something that still force me to store the argument of a for...next cycle into a variable to avoid calculation at every loop.

uhh, Massimo, this is a funny one - the new compiler DOES allow you to avoid that - it introduced for..each ;-)

Any change to the semantics of the existing 'for' statement would break other people's code.


_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>

Search the archives of this list here:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>

Reply via email to