On Oct 12, 2006, at 1:53 PM, Ronald Vogelaar wrote:
As my last contribution to this thread today, I just did what could
have answered my question about extends in the first place. I did
some timing on using the simple extend that replaces i=i+1 with
i.Incr.
It turns out that using i.Incr takes just over three times as long
to execute as i=i+1 (on Windows).
Make sure you use the #pragma DisableBackgroundTasks before the
loop. If you don't then you would get an artificial benchmark
because of background processing. I would expect that the overhead
would be even higher than 3x.
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>
Search the archives of this list here:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
