On 10/23/06 10:57 AM, "Trausti Thor Johannsson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Also, if you don't use the db classes that come with RB but instead > use the classes that come with Valentina, Valentina is so much > faster, you won't believe your eyes, I did not. I have an RB application that uses Vserver. It's just a simple multi-user application that helps manage contacts and tasks, and it also provides limited note sharing here on my local network. Not a big deal. Earlier this year, I was implementing some enhancements to the application while also upgrading to a newer version of Vserver. I started testing the upgrade and was dismayed to discover the application's interaction with Vserver to be *much* more sluggish than the prior version of Vserver. It was taking a full second or two to perform queries that the prior version of Vserver had been performing nearly instantaneously. Mightily disappointed, I started stepping through the RB code to see if I could speed things up some. I discovered that due to a simple programming error in a loop, my application was accidentally submitting 30! queries at a point where it was only supposed to submit 1! Somehow, Vserver was able to return 30 separate recordsets so swiftly that my app merely became "sluggish". Although I'm delighted to promote vserver at every opportunity, there is no need to take my word for it. The vServer/V4RB demo is pretty generous, and you can see the performance for yourself if you are willing to take the time to set up some good tests. -- Russ Tyndall Wake Forest, NC _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode: <http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/> Search the archives of this list here: <http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
