Maybe there is some justification for an interim "point" release - JUST to address the most critical "shop stoppers" - if any are present. Maybe those "show- stopper" fixes could be limited to a fixed number - 3 or something small and chosen by some form of user vote, just my thoughts....
On 9/4/07 15:45, "Joe Huber" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Apr 9, 2007, at 9:03 AM, Daniel Stenning wrote: >> >>> I cant ever remember anyone posting a complaint that RS was taking >>> too long to make the next release, either in the 5.5 days or Rb200X + > > Well even THIS discussion is about people complaining that they don't > want to wait the 90 days for the next release. It happens ALL the > time, "Why do I have to wait so long for my bug to be fixed?" > > I'm reasonably happy with r2, because all the new bugs in existing > features seem to be in the IDE which can be worked around. The ones I > hate are new framework bugs which break existing projects and don't > have a workaround. > > Be glad it only takes a drag-n-drop to workaround the file > associations problem on Windows. It could be a lot worse. > > Regards, > Joe Huber > _______________________________________________ > Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode: > <http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/> > > Search the archives: > <http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html> > Regards, Dan _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode: <http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/> Search the archives: <http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
