On Monday 4 September 2006 04:34, Roberto Saccon wrote: > Bram, what VNC are you using RealVNC, UltraVNC or TigthVNC ? Which is > best ? It seems they are all GPL. Are you extracting relevant source > code from those VNC clients, or do they provide a ready-to-use shared > lib for all plattforms ?
I'm using mainly TIghtVNC-server on Linux, but RealVNC seems to perform better on Windows. I've hacked the TightVNC client so it's able to record the stream into some file, which get parsed afterwards to the Instudeo file format. I've read about a vnc library, but haven't tested it yet, it looks promising though. > and about your schematic, what means (RFX/NX/X), what is the > difference between default environment and own desktop. This makes > only sense to me in the context of X. And where is the red5 Server ? Well, RFB is the protocol used by VNC, NX is a new protocol I've been investigating, developed by NoMachine (nomachine.com). It's very useful for (very) remote desktops, and outperforms VNC and (MS's) RDP in nearly all situations. X is just remote X. By this, I mean the three remote-desktop protocols I'd like to investigating for use in the project. The Red5 server would reside on the proxy server/router (P2P doesn't need any server at all, but isn't really viable I think). Btw, additional question, how hard would it be to interface ffmpeg/gstreamer from within Red5 ? Bram _______________________________________________ Red5 mailing list [email protected] http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org
