On Sun, 22 Mar 1998, Fred Whipple wrote:
> Does this imply that the IMAP server with RHL5 is relatively good?
It's as good as anybody else's. Considering that IMAP stands for 'Interim
Message Application Protocol' or some such, IMAP implementations are a
little bit different everywhere. I believe RedHat's is about 99%
compliant with the RFC, however. You won't do any better.
> The major problem here being that the 'network' is the Internet. That is, my
Well, then, I wouldn't recommend using NFS for it then. Or Samba, which
is even worse (unless you're using Windows at home, of course).
> home with me can get very very bulky (i.e., from this email list). I'm
> looking for a good way to access the mail on my workstation disk, and since I
I would recommend that you use pine, which has an IMAP that works nicely
with Redhat's. I think XFmail speaks IMAP too, if you want X windows. I
don't guarantee that.
You can, of course, continue to get your mail by telnetting into the
system which contains your mail.
--
PLEASE read the Red Hat FAQ, Tips, Errata and the MAILING LIST ARCHIVES!
http://www.redhat.com/RedHat-FAQ /RedHat-Errata /RedHat-Tips /mailing-lists
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe" as the Subject.
