I think, Bill, that you're arguing against people that don't exist.
Hence their silence.

I'm not a "models-only" guy.

On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 2:06 PM, William Marino <[email protected]> wrote:
> I took your silence as a stunned admission...
>
> John, where are you?  I need back up!
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] 
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Ray Salemi
> Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2010 2:04 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: UZR boo-boo
>
> You will notice my silence on the topic.
>
> ...
>
> oops.
>
> On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 2:01 PM, Tom Salemi <[email protected]> wrote:
>> OH DEAR GOD NOT THIS ARGUMENT AGAIN!!!
>>
>>
>> Where's my eye gouger!?!
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 1:46 PM, William Marino <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> For those slavishly tied to models, this should really rock your world.
>>> If you go back to the earlier discussion re: defense of Bay (and Ellsbury),
>>> there was debate on over reliance on models.  This is proof that pure stats
>>> are no better than pure scout.  All of it is data and the real value added
>>> is in the interpretation of the data by people.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ________________________________
>>>
>>> From: [email protected]
>>> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Matt & Olga McSorley
>>> Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2010 10:50 AM
>>> To: [email protected]
>>> Subject: UZR boo-boo
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> From today's Herald Red Sox blog. This is me feeling vindicated for
>>> contending Jason Bay was not the lousy outfielder we were all told he was in
>>> the off-season:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -- Matt
>>>
>>> UZR owes Jason Bay an apology
>>>
>>> This slipped through the cracks, but the good folks at FanGraphs - who are
>>> constantly tweaking their formulas in an effort to make them as accurate as
>>> possible - recently tackled what many within the game considered one of the
>>> biggest flaws of UZR, or Ultimate Zone Rating, which was treated as Gospel
>>> this winter during all the discussions of defense around these parts.
>>>
>>> That flaw was UZR's inability to handle quirky parks like Fenway, where
>>> left field and center field are of such strange configurations, they cannot
>>> be judged with a cookie cutter model.
>>>
>>> It turns out that Mitchel Lichtman, the creator of UZR, agreed, so he
>>> augmented his model to better gauge things like left field at Fenway, or
>>> right field in Minnesota, or the entire outfield at Coors, as the FanGraphs
>>> people explain.
>>>
>>> The upshot of these changes is that most players were relatively
>>> unaffected. However - and this is a big however - one player had his UZR
>>> significantly altered by the fixes, which were retroactively applied to old
>>> data: Jason Bay.
>>>
>>> The former Red Sox outfielder, who was killed all winter for his
>>> horrendous defense (which was part of the justification for letting him sign
>>> a free agent deal with the Mets) saw his UZR shift from minus-13.8 runs to
>>> plus-1.9. Bay's play in 2009 obviously didn't change. Only the numbers did.
>>> And the new numbers say Bay was not horribly below average last year, but in
>>> fact saved the Red Sox a couple of runs in left.
>>>
>>> It wouldn't have made a difference as far as the Red Sox re-signing Bay -
>>> we now know that was an impossibility once their deal collapsed at the
>>> All-Star break over his medicals - but it would have at least changed the
>>> narrative. Maybe fans and media members wouldn't have been so quick to give
>>> up on the biggest bat in the lineup if they hadn't been able to lean on the
>>> "he can't play defense" crutch
>>>
>>> --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>>> "Red Sox Citizens" group.
>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>> [email protected].
>>> For more options, visit this group at
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/redsoxcitizens?hl=en.
>>>
>>> --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>>> "Red Sox Citizens" group.
>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>> [email protected].
>>> For more options, visit this group at
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/redsoxcitizens?hl=en.
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "Red Sox Citizens" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> [email protected].
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/redsoxcitizens?hl=en.
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Author of "FPGA Simulation: A Complete Step-by-Step Guide"
> www.fpgasimulation.com
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Red Sox Citizens" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/redsoxcitizens?hl=en.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Red Sox Citizens" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/redsoxcitizens?hl=en.
>
>



-- 
Author of "FPGA Simulation: A Complete Step-by-Step Guide"
www.fpgasimulation.com

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Red 
Sox Citizens" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/redsoxcitizens?hl=en.

Reply via email to