On Fri, May 11, 2018, at 15:32, James Galvin wrote: > With that, version 06 of this document has been published and the chairs > are declaring WGLC closed. The document is now ready for submission to > IESG for consideration as a Proposed Standard.
Isn't that a little rushed? >From a quick search I have found about only 2 explicit mention of support of >this document, from Pieter and Scott (as for myself I can not say I >explicitely support it because I am still uneasy by the need for it or not >seeing it and still not understanding some part of it like all the "role" >part). Also the document went into so many iterations during the period that it was basicaly impossible to follow (one night I have tried reviewing its newest version by implementing it in my client... to find out in the morning that a new version went out so I kind of decided to stop giving it my time before it stabilizes in some way); some new comments even just popped out on the mailing-list yesterday. So I feel uneasy process-wise. Based on the amount of iterations during WGLC it looks like to me that there is at least still some work needed on it, and I am not sure its current version correspond really to the working group consensus. The above applies the same way for the two "organization" documents. -- Patrick Mevzek _______________________________________________ regext mailing list regext@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
