Chairs, Do we postpone the submission to IESG or do I continue my write-up?
@Patrick, did you have time in mean time to catch up? How would you like the draft to be changed in order to support it? I guess it's the fact that roles are defined as properties of the organization and at the same time as properties of the link? Kind regards Pieter > On 22 May 2018, at 08:57, Pieter Vandepitte <pieter.vandepi...@dnsbelgium.be> > wrote: > > Hi all, > > Other thoughts? I think it's important as document shepherd to know whether > we should move on or not. > > Kind regards > > Pieter > >> On 21 May 2018, at 05:19, Patrick Mevzek <p...@dotandco.com> wrote: >> >> On Fri, May 11, 2018, at 15:32, James Galvin wrote: >>> With that, version 06 of this document has been published and the chairs >>> are declaring WGLC closed. The document is now ready for submission to >>> IESG for consideration as a Proposed Standard. >> >> Isn't that a little rushed? >> >>> From a quick search I have found about only 2 explicit mention of support >>> of this document, from Pieter and Scott (as for myself I can not say I >>> explicitely support it because I am still uneasy by the need for it or not >>> seeing it and still not understanding some part of it like all the "role" >>> part). >> >> Also the document went into so many iterations during the period that it was >> basicaly impossible to follow >> (one night I have tried reviewing its newest version by implementing it in >> my client... to find out in the morning that a new version went out so I >> kind of decided to stop giving it my time before it stabilizes in some way); >> some new comments even just popped out on the mailing-list yesterday. >> >> So I feel uneasy process-wise. Based on the amount of iterations during WGLC >> it looks like to me that there is at least still some work needed on it, and >> I am not sure its current version correspond really to the working group >> consensus. >> >> The above applies the same way for the two "organization" documents. >> >> -- >> Patrick Mevzek >> >> _______________________________________________ >> regext mailing list >> regext@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext > _______________________________________________ regext mailing list regext@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
