On 12/13/2001 10:45 PM, Chris Mason wrote: > > On Thursday, December 13, 2001 10:41:13 PM +0100 Manuel Krause > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >>It's very clear now that the expanding-truncate-4 patch needs to be >>excluded and/or adjusted, too. :-) I hope that works for you after your >>inode-attrs experiment! >> > > Odd, which low latency patches were you running? > > -chris >
With 2.4.16 +reiserfs-patches: Andrew Mortons low-latency patch http://www.zip.com.au/~akpm/linux/2.4.16-low-latency.patch.gz (from page http://www.zip.com.au/~akpm/linux/schedlat.html ) and with 2.4.17-pre8 +reiserfs-patches: the preemptible kernel & lock-break patches from Robert M. Love http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/rml/preempt-kernel/v2.4/preempt-kernel-rml-2.4.17-pre8-1.patch & http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/rml/lock-break/v2.4/lock-break-rml-2.4.17-pre8-1.patch (from page http://www.tech9.net/rml/linux/ ) Thanks, Manuel
