Am Donnerstag, 13. Dezember 2001 23:16 schrieb Chris Mason: > On Thursday, December 13, 2001 11:17:12 PM +0100 Manuel Krause > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 12/13/2001 10:45 PM, Chris Mason wrote: > >> On Thursday, December 13, 2001 10:41:13 PM +0100 Manuel Krause > >> > >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> It's very clear now that the expanding-truncate-4 patch needs to be > >>> excluded and/or adjusted, too. :-) I hope that works for you after your > >>> inode-attrs experiment! > >> > >> Odd, which low latency patches were you running? > >> > >> -chris > > > > With 2.4.16 +reiserfs-patches: Andrew Mortons low-latency patch > > > > http://www.zip.com.au/~akpm/linux/2.4.16-low-latency.patch.gz > > (from page http://www.zip.com.au/~akpm/linux/schedlat.html ) > > This should be safe. Any chance I could talk you into testing 2.4.17-pre8 > + andrew's patch?
Maybe Manuel will...;-) The latest lock-break-rml-2.4.17-pre8-1.patch from Robert is based on Andrew's patch and include some (small) lock-breaks for ReiserFS. Any comments Chris? Has Robert something overlooked? Maybe only when expanding-truncate-4.patch comes into play? -Dieter BTW I am going after Manuel and try 2.4.17-pre8-preempt + lock-break + K-N+P witchout Chris's one.
