On 12/13/2001 11:51 PM, Dieter Nützel wrote: > Am Donnerstag, 13. Dezember 2001 23:16 schrieb Chris Mason: > >>On Thursday, December 13, 2001 11:17:12 PM +0100 Manuel Krause >> >><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>>On 12/13/2001 10:45 PM, Chris Mason wrote: >>> >>>>On Thursday, December 13, 2001 10:41:13 PM +0100 Manuel Krause >>>> >>>><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>> >>>>>It's very clear now that the expanding-truncate-4 patch needs to be >>>>>excluded and/or adjusted, too. :-) I hope that works for you after your >>>>>inode-attrs experiment! >>>>> >>>>Odd, which low latency patches were you running? >>>> >>>>-chris >>>> >>>With 2.4.16 +reiserfs-patches: Andrew Mortons low-latency patch >>> >>>http://www.zip.com.au/~akpm/linux/2.4.16-low-latency.patch.gz >>>(from page http://www.zip.com.au/~akpm/linux/schedlat.html ) >>> >>This should be safe. Any chance I could talk you into testing 2.4.17-pre8 >>+ andrew's patch? >> > > Maybe Manuel will...;-) > > The latest lock-break-rml-2.4.17-pre8-1.patch from Robert is based on > Andrew's patch and include some (small) lock-breaks for ReiserFS. > > Any comments Chris? > Has Robert something overlooked? > Maybe only when expanding-truncate-4.patch comes into play? > > -Dieter > > BTW I am going after Manuel and try 2.4.17-pre8-preempt + lock-break + K-N+P > witchout Chris's one. > >
That might be no good idea. I've now double checked that I really applied the mentioned patches but still get corruptions in the old way. A --rebuild-tree fixes them, I reboot and reboot *again* some minutes later: Then I find wrong permissions and some disappearing files. Mmh. Dangerous. Best wishes, Manuel
