Dean I agree with you for public safety you want new.  But as an Engineer and an Amateur I have to disagree with you for Amateur use.
 
Amateur Radio is about experimentation and building projects to the best quality you can.  Unfortunately in this day and age few Hams build stuff anymore, so when I see people on this list wanting to build repeaters to a high quality level it just plain warms my heart.  This is what Ham Radio is supposed to be about.
 
Now as to the term "junk" remember what is junk to one man is gold to another.  Yes we start with things like GE Mstr. II Exec's that commercial radio shops deem not fit for public safety.  Their reason is usually based on the cost to repair them vs. new.  As Hams we can take these and restore them back to new condition or better because were not trying to make a profit.  We do it because we love to build and experiment.
 
You are looking at it from a commercial view point not an Amateur Radio Operator view point and there is a big difference.  So to those of you who like to build projects a hearty "RIGHT ON" this keeps Ham radio alive.
 
73,
Mike/K1EG
Another Ole Fart in the Radio Field.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2005 2:48 PM
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] 220 Mhz. repeater

Hello All,
I do not know about some of the bands that are
posted. I do know that with Kenwood, Kenwood
Systems and Maggiore you get a two year wan tee.
With Motorola, Midland and Johnson you get a 1 year.
We do not carry any thing else. I am not in radio
sales but I do know if I buy a new car it is going to
get fixed for a while when it is new. I know with
the above repeaters I will get them fixed and I
will not pay for parts or labor for some time.
I am not a Ham and do not build repeaters from
junk as stated earlier. I do manage four shops that
puts together a lot of repeater for public safety
and business folks. well over 200 a year at this
point. I stand by my statement. Buy new. Be happy.
Very best,
Dean Westbrook, EE,PE.
 














Yahoo! Groups Links

Reply via email to