Then there is the proactive approach rather than the reactive approach
which you describe. In the proactive approach, you will have a repeater
set up and ready to go - a GOOD repeater that can handle emergency duty
cycle which typically is much closer to 100%. This repeater will be
stored in a suitcase or something and be ready to go within minutes. The
LAST thing I want to rely on in an emergency is a 'thrown together'
repeater that may fail at any time.
Disaster preparedness is NOT the ability to make something after you
need it.
Joe M.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Equally, there are no scheduled disasters, diasaters don't have a
> specified length, and disasters aren't catogorized as caused by American
> Acts if God, or Jap Acts of God. The ability to use 2 transcivers to
> make an quick repeater using the data jack is a useful tool.
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
