--- In [email protected], Cort Buffington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote:
>
> I spent years with just a 50uA panel meter with lead wires and pins 
on  
> the end -- sticking the pins in the right socket positions to take 
the  
> readings. Not fun, but when I was broke in and just out of college 
it  
> worked a lot better than spending money on a test set.
> 
> I never met a Mitrek receiver that didn't reasonably well as low 
as  
> the helical resonators would tune. They'd lose a little 
sensitivity,  
> but if the helicals didn't bottom out, they worked. That was my  
> limiting factor. Transmitters seemed to always work, though the PA  
> produced more heat as they got farther away from their comfort zone.
> 
> On Apr 29, 2008, at 7:47 PM, emt747 wrote:
> 
> > Hello all,
> >
> > 4 questions:
> >
> > 1- Has anybody had any luck tuning the TX down to 438.XXX?
> >
> > 2- What kind of RX sens. is expected on 448.XXX? I am getting  
> > around .50uV
> >
> > 2- Does anybody have any tips on tuning the Mitrek without the 
test  
> > set?

        It's not easy, and without a meter it's not accurate just by 
listening to the signal to noise ratio, with signal down in the 
noise!!

Incidently, ALWAYS use a 20,000 ohm resistor in series with the 50 
microamp meter used to tune it up.  The test set uses the resistor 
built in.


> >
> > 3- Does anybody have a test set for sale?

         It's easier to build one rather that to buy, partiularly on 
an auction, but using without removable adapter cords!!


Dick, W7TIO   
> >
> > I am working with T34JJA3900DK,T34JJA3900DL,T34JJA3900AK
> >
> > Any help or ideas would be great.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Brent
> >
> >
> > 
> 
> --
> Cort Buffington
> H: +1-785-838-3034
> M: +1-785-865-7206
>


Reply via email to