Uggh, 

You're reminding me that one of my customers used hundreds of the WRONG
BNC's for the cable they were running T3's with at a central office site in
NJ.

The T3's go up... the T3's go down... whee!  All it takes is for someone to
walk back there and brush up against them. 

Sorry, OT I know... just giving me the willies.

Nate 


-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of John J. Riddell
Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2009 2:12 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Coax Interconnect (Inside Repeater)

Mike,  the BNC connector was designed for quick 
 insertion / disconnect and works very well in most applications.

However the Type "N" connector is much more robust and 
would be my choice for critical connections such as a 
Duplexer  or an Antenna  etc....

We use them all the time in the Telephone business for 
DS-3 connections.

Here is some history on the BNC connector...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BNC_connector

73 John VE3AMZ




----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Mike Pugh" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2009 3:55 PM
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Coax Interconnect (Inside Repeater)


> Alexander N Tubonjic wrote:
>>   I am wanting to swap out the BNC receiver connector to an N
>> connector on my Kenwood TKR-750 2 meter repeater. After contacting
>> Kenwood and getting quoted some crack prices I figured I'd see if
>> anyone has anything laying around or has any ideas on here.
>>
>>   
> Why? electrically, the BNC connectors and the N connectors are the same 
> thing. Don't believe me? Try plugging them together.. Even though they 
> won't latch together, electrically, they fit together perfectly, and can 
> be used this way in an emergency if you're at a tower site and find you 
> don't have the proper connector.. What am I missing? Mike
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------
> 
> 
> 
> Yahoo! Groups Links
> 
> 
> 
>

------------------------------------



Yahoo! Groups Links




Reply via email to