Hi John,
When you were on the Board along with me, what would you have done if there were an application for coordination come through that was intended for a closed system. Mike Mullarkey K7PFJ 6886 Sage Ave Firestone, Co 80504 303-954-9695 Home 303-954-9693 Home Office & Fax 303-718-8052 Cellular From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com [mailto:repeater-buil...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of JOHN MACKEY Sent: Sunday, July 26, 2009 1:05 PM To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Closed Repeaters ------ Original Message ------ Received: Sun, 26 Jul 2009 11:55:42 AM PDT To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com <mailto:Repeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com> > >Today if someone is using the output of a repeater frequency for a simplex > >conversation and someone else wanted to use the repeater then there would > >be interference to the conversation that was first on that > >frequency. Could this be considered malicious interference? Times like this it is interesting to point out the best known simplex freq of 146.52 MHz is in the repeater sub-band and NOT the simplex sub-band!! No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 8.5.392 / Virus Database: 270.13.31/2264 - Release Date: 07/26/09 11:07:00
