skipp025 wrote: > > > The disappointing part of narrow banding is the text in > the below message. I've been able to narrow band a heck > of a lot of repeater equipment. Surplus repeaters and > radio equipment are a gold mine to innovative and motivated > radio people, who are willing to do both the homework and > technical work. > > It's a lot more expensive and sad to think a lot of > equipment is being replaced, when other viable options > are available. > > s. >
What's sad is how much will likely go in the dumpster instead into some deserving ham's hands ;c} Actually, there is still a legal question as to whether equipment that was not type-accepted for narrowband originally will still be legal if the transmitter is narrowbanded, ie, deviation turned down. The FCC has yet to clarify much of anything like that.
