Hi Brain,

I have 220 cavities available and can build a duplexer (tuned to your frequency 
pair) if needed.

Contact me directly if you would like more information.

    Steve.

  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: K5IN 
  To: [email protected] 
  Sent: Saturday, January 02, 2010 3:18 AM
  Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] 220 repeater


    

  Good evening,


  Your e-mail brings up one question: used duplexers for 220 where?


  Brian
    ----- Original Message ----- 
    From: Oz-in-DFW 
    To: [email protected] 
    Sent: Friday, January 01, 2010 9:40 PM
    Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] 220 repeater


      
    Micor conversions work very well, but are rather involved. 

    MVP/Exec/Mastr II conversions are much easier and work as well.  The MVP 
package works out really well. 

    Both the Motorola and GE radios rely on a different PA.  Most use a hybrid 
"brick" to get power.  I have several of these I've been getting $25/ea for.  
WA5VJB did a nice interface board for them.  

    There are also a number of Kyodo/Nokia BSR 220 radios out there. I sold a 
bunch of them, but I don't think I have any more. Might have one.  They are 
almost as good as the Moto/GE option and are synthesized. An EPROM sets the 
operating channels. I have docs if you need them. 

    There are a lot of surplus duplexers and combiners floating around from 
failed 220 trunking systems.  Keep an eye peeled. DB built a short vhf high 
split duplexer that's a snap to convert to 220.  If you find a narrow spaced 
six can dupe on a  channel above 160 Mhz that is about 12 or 14" tall, it's 
probably one of these. 

    Oz

    On 1/1/2010 10:32 PM, Dan Blasberg wrote: 

        
      All right folks,

      For those that run a 220 repeater, what are you running as far as the 
      machine itself?

      A local group is looking to put a 220 MHz repeater on the air and 
      would like some ideas.

      Thanks,

      Dan
      KA8YPY




-- 
mailto:[email protected]    
Oz
POB 93167 
Southlake, TX 76092 (Near DFW Airport) 





  

Reply via email to