Mike, Thanks for the info, next time I am through your neck of the woods on my way to visit family, i will load up your machine in the HT.
Dan KA8YPY On Feb 15, 2010, at 12:00 AM, <[email protected]> <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi Dan, > > Agree with the TDMA upgrade but were not supposed to talk about that > now, ha ha. > > I think most of us who are installing the trbo systems are using > color code 1 and some could be using other codes. I think it would > be neat if there were a web site that compiled all the systems > owners could login and add their information to their prospective > users. > > I am going to keep our system on color code 1 using IPSC IP Site > Connect. Slot 1 is for local traffic and slot 2 is for IPSC IP Site > Connect. > > > Mike Mullarkey K7PFJ > 6886 Sage Ave > Firestone, Co 80504 > 303-736-9693 > > > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected] > ] On Behalf Of Dan Blasberg > Sent: Sunday, February 14, 2010 9:14 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] HAM Mototrbo Systems > > > The Phase 2 P25 standard is far from complete. > > And yes, there are several TDMA "TYPE 2" systems up and working, but > none are certified "PHASE 2" P25 systems. > > I know in our county, the contract written with Motorola includes a > statement about upgrading the system to an approved/certified Phase 2 > system when the standard is complete, at no cost to the county. This > not only includes infrustructure, but all of the radios as well. > > Now, back to the topic at had...MOTOTRBO Amateur Systems....Is > everyone leaving the system setting in there respective defaults, or > is there some recommendation for settings? > > Dan > KA8YPY > > On Feb 14, 2010, at 9:40 PM, MCH wrote: > > > I think the Phase II standard is pretty much a done deal, it will be > > TDMA, and there are already Phase II systems on the air. > > > > Joe M. > > > > Dan Blasberg wrote: > >> P25 phase 2 is indeed supposed to be TDMA, the question is will > it be > >> Motorola's implementation or another? Just because Motorola comes > >> out > >> with a system first does not always mean it will be accepted as the > >> defacto standard, as was not the case with Motorola VSLEP for their > >> 1st digital implementation. > >> > >> Dan > >> KA8YPY > >> > >> > >> > >> On Feb 14, 2010, at 5:14 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >>> > >>> I am aware of the repeaters in Cal and that is awesome. The new > APX > >>> series radio is TDMA compliant and if past history continues to > >>> prevail the TDMA phase 2 P25 will be TDMA. > >>> > >>> > >>> Mike Mullarkey K7PFJ > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> From: [email protected] > >>> [mailto:[email protected] > >>> ] On Behalf Of Gary > >>> Sent: Sunday, February 14, 2010 1:38 PM > >>> To: [email protected] > >>> Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] HAM Mototrbo Systems > >>> > >>> > >>> Here in Southern CA. (LA, Orange, and San Diego counties) we > have at > >>> least 4 > >>> Mototrbo repeaters running AND IPSC linked on the amateur band. > >>> There are > >>> more than two dozen users known to have invested in Trbo radios > with > >>> interest growing steadily. Given the behind-the-scenes Mototrbo > >>> activity > >>> that has been taking place over the past two years in amateur > radio > >>> it's > >>> become increasingly clear that the system works well and that > >>> Motorola is > >>> continuing to improve or release features and tools all the time. > >>> They > >>> really hope APCO adopts their TDMA format as the next generation > of > >>> P25 but > >>> that is yet to be seen meanwhile Motorola is clearly focused on > >>> developing > >>> the Mototrbo platform. > >>> Gary > >>> > >>> -----Original Message----- > >>> From: [email protected] > >>> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Dan > Blasberg > >>> Sent: Sunday, February 14, 2010 10:12 AM > >>> To: [email protected] > >>> Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] HAM Mototrbo Systems > >>> > >>> Mike, > >>> > >>> In the DC area there is currently one UHF machine and about 5-10 > >>> amateurs playing with MOTOTRBO. > >>> > >>> I would be interested to know what other areas are using for > setting > >>> or are they leaving everything in the default setting? > >>> > >>> Dan > >>> KA8YPY > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >> > >> > >> > >> ------------------------------------ > >> > >> > >> > >> Yahoo! Groups Links > >> > >> > >> > >> > > > > > > ------------------------------------ > > > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > > > >
