Tim Anderson wrote:
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
From the requirements at
"ASF Repository shall ... allow browsing and downloading of artifacts by
humans via normal
Requiring a version to be part of the artifact file name when the
is only useful
to end users (e.g README), reduces clarity.
But it does increase usability sometimes.
README for which version?
The README is for version 1.1 of commons-dbcp.
By implication - the README is not an artifact but a feature of a version.
Is that a reasonable conclusion?
Stephen J. McConnell