http://nagoya.apache.org/eyebrowse/[EMAIL PROTECTED]&ms gNo=266
> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Sunday, 9 November 2003 7:28 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Comments on URI Syntax > > > Where is "Tim's Layout"? > -- > dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting > Blog: http://blogs.codehaus.org/people/dion/ > Pub Key:http://blogs.codehaus.org/people/dion/public-key.asc > > > "Noel J. Bergman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 09/11/2003 06:22:51 PM: > > > Jason, > > > > I think that Tim's ideas were pretty well-thought out and reflect a > workable > > consensus. The changes you are making to his ideas, if I read the > > correctly, are to mandate a couple of things that he did not rule out, > but > > permitted to remain optional. Having them as optional does not strike > me as > > a problem. > > > > Best practices can always suggest that optional elements be used, and > we'll > > discover in practice how broadly the rule(s) should apply. > > > > We should make sure that folks like William Rowe and others who have > > commented on the repository structure lately take a look at, and provide > > feedback on, Tim's layout. > > > > --- Noel > > > >
