http://nagoya.apache.org/eyebrowse/[EMAIL PROTECTED]&ms
gNo=266

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, 9 November 2003 7:28 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Comments on URI Syntax
>
>
> Where is "Tim's Layout"?
> --
> dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting
> Blog:      http://blogs.codehaus.org/people/dion/
> Pub Key:http://blogs.codehaus.org/people/dion/public-key.asc
>
>
> "Noel J. Bergman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 09/11/2003 06:22:51 PM:
>
> > Jason,
> >
> > I think that Tim's ideas were pretty well-thought out and reflect a
> workable
> > consensus.  The changes you are making to his ideas, if I read the
> > correctly, are to mandate a couple of things that he did not rule out,
> but
> > permitted to remain optional.  Having them as optional does not strike
> me as
> > a problem.
> >
> > Best practices can always suggest that optional elements be used, and
> we'll
> > discover in practice how broadly the rule(s) should apply.
> >
> > We should make sure that folks like William Rowe and others who have
> > commented on the repository structure lately take a look at, and provide
> > feedback on, Tim's layout.
> >
> >    --- Noel
> >
>
>


Reply via email to