Perhaps packages which provide middleware functionality should be named ``wsgi.*``, e.g. ``wsgi.bitblt`` or ``wsgi.who`` and we'd opt similar namespaces for packages that belong to other realms.
I'm not sure this ``repoze.*`` notion is very healthy in terms of getting traction outside the Zope-community, although .what and .who have gained some popularity in spite of their nebulous namespace. What's the feeling on brand-like names such as ``WebOb``, or ``Routes``? That might be the right approach for more conceptual packages. At least that's my motivation for naming the new package ``Chameleon``. I think .who might fall in this category, not being just a library, but something more conceptual, e.g. ``Who``. \malthe _______________________________________________ Repoze-dev mailing list Repoze-dev@lists.repoze.org http://lists.repoze.org/listinfo/repoze-dev
