On 9 April 2010 20:27, Hanno Schlichting <ha...@hannosch.eu> wrote: > - Generally there's no real optimizations in the code and the current > infrastructure makes them hard to write. Like generating efficient > code for stuff like "var1 string:'static'". Or not filling the repeat > variable if it isn't used inside a repeat block. Maybe I should try > again harder, but I failed at both of these the last times I tried ;)
The approach we took was practical, or seemed practical. Maybe we should have used a different strategy: - phase 1: generate high-level code that employs function calls - phase 2: inline function calls or similar expansion - phase 3: code optimization Also, I realized while writing the ``curry`` library that things like temporary variables can be dealt with very efficiently by subclassing e.g. ``ast.Name`` into ``TemporaryName`` and simply extending the code generator. \malthe _______________________________________________ Repoze-dev mailing list Repoze-dev@lists.repoze.org http://lists.repoze.org/listinfo/repoze-dev
