On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 10:57:48PM +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:
> > The "right" fix for this very little anomaly is that they should not
> > be in the list of packages to be built to begin with.
> nope, we have something better, see above :) how did you notice?
I was making package lists to check for "dpkg-buildpackage -A",
for amd64 and for i386.
There are only a few packages buildable on i386 but not on amd64.
Of those, cmucl FTBFS (just reported, without even using -A), so I
went to reproducible.debian.net to confirm, and the funny thing is
that it appeared as "depwait".
> also please revert this commit/change, thanks!
Ok, I've made one more commit which not only reverts the change I did
but also drops a comment similar which according to what you have just
said it should not be in notes.git.
Reproducible-builds mailing list