On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 10:57:48PM +0100, Holger Levsen wrote: > > The "right" fix for this very little anomaly is that they should not > > be in the list of packages to be built to begin with. > > nope, we have something better, see above :) how did you notice?
I was making package lists to check for "dpkg-buildpackage -A", for amd64 and for i386. There are only a few packages buildable on i386 but not on amd64. Of those, cmucl FTBFS (just reported, without even using -A), so I went to reproducible.debian.net to confirm, and the funny thing is that it appeared as "depwait". > also please revert this commit/change, thanks! Ok, I've made one more commit which not only reverts the change I did but also drops a comment similar which according to what you have just said it should not be in notes.git. Thanks. _______________________________________________ Reproducible-builds mailing list Reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/reproducible-builds
