Santiago Vila:
> Let's take cmucl as an example:
> Package: cmucl
> Architecture: i386 all
> It has "all", yes, but implicitly I take the Architecture line
> as saying that I should only try to build the "Arch: all" package
> using a i386 autobuilder.
> Does this make sense?

I think the question can be phrased as: should architecture-independent
packages be buildable on all architectures?

My own answer would be: yes, as long as they don't mandate a particular
architecture in their Build-Depends-Indep.

Is there something wrong with this answer?

Lunar                                .''`.                    : :Ⓐ  :  # apt-get install anarchism
                                    `. `'` 

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reproducible-builds mailing list

Reply via email to