Hi Valerie et al -
I need guidance on the process we should be following for the
code reviews. I am sponsoring CR 6613349 for Jason King.
Does the requester drive the code review? Where do they send
the code for review? What is the format of the code review?
I can ask the requester to send a webrev out for review, but it
isn't clear which email alias to send it to since the change is in
common code and not exactly tied to a particular technology area.
You have mentioned previously that reviewers need not be Sun
I just need to know what to ask the requester to do to get the
code reviewed per the Sun process.
On 08/21/08 15:29, Valerie Bubb Fenwick wrote:
> Hi Everyone -
> We finally have the new best practices for sponsors for
> Mercurial updated here:
> There are actually choices for acknowledging the contributor
> now. Please work with the contributor to determine the best
> way of handling this for each particular case.
> This other page has recently been updated as well, please
> make sure you check it out, even if you have been a sponsor
> or CRT member for a long time:
> Many thanks to Mark Nelson, Rich Lowe, Bonnie Corwin & John Beck
> for their assistance on getting these pages "just right".
> Thank you,
> Valerie, ON CRT Chair