Hi Valerie et al - I need guidance on the process we should be following for the code reviews. I am sponsoring CR 6613349 for Jason King.
Does the requester drive the code review? Where do they send the code for review? What is the format of the code review? I can ask the requester to send a webrev out for review, but it isn't clear which email alias to send it to since the change is in common code and not exactly tied to a particular technology area. You have mentioned previously that reviewers need not be Sun employees. I just need to know what to ask the requester to do to get the code reviewed per the Sun process. thanks, -jim On 08/21/08 15:29, Valerie Bubb Fenwick wrote: > Hi Everyone - > > We finally have the new best practices for sponsors for > Mercurial updated here: > http://opensolaris.org/os/community/on/crt/sponsor-tasks/ > > There are actually choices for acknowledging the contributor > now. Please work with the contributor to determine the best > way of handling this for each particular case. > > This other page has recently been updated as well, please > make sure you check it out, even if you have been a sponsor > or CRT member for a long time: > http://opensolaris.org/os/community/on/crt/rti-nits/ > > Many thanks to Mark Nelson, Rich Lowe, Bonnie Corwin & John Beck > for their assistance on getting these pages "just right". > > Thank you, > > Valerie, ON CRT Chair >
