Something which appears frequently here is "you should really be using
post-review". At the moment, this is a bad answer, because there is no
usable Windows GUI that does post-review.

First, let me give you some of my background. I am
Linux-Emacs-Python-Bazaar kind of programmer. I worked for several
years as a programmer on, and before that I
worked on For the last year I have been working
in an investment bank, in a team where the standard development
environment is Windows-Visual-C++-TortoiseSVN.  Note that I say
TortoiseSVN: most of folks involved in writing code are actually
mathematicians, they do not consider themselves as programmers
(they're wrong), but getting them to use command-line Subversion is
out of the question. First because sucks, but also because
they are just not interested in this kind of arcana.

Now, I introduced ReviewBoard there because doing code reviews by
mailing around unified diffs, as I used to do it on Launchpad, was
just unnecessary distracting pain to my Windows-using collaborators.
In this context, they easiest and least distracting way I found for
them submit reviews was to show them the specific recipe required for
TortoiseSVN to generate diffs that contain paths that reviewboard can
process (the naive approach produces a diff with absolute filesystem
paths, gah!).

I would love to be able to tell them: Here's a setup.exe, after you
install it, you will have new contextual menu entry in explorer that
allows up to submit a new review or upload a new diff to an existing
review. But until there is something close to that, they will still
use TortoiseSVN to generate a diff.

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"reviewboard" group.
To post to this group, send email to
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
For more options, visit this group at

Reply via email to