On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 22:53, Christian Hammond <[email protected]> wrote: > We would love this too, and we're hoping to get some student proposals from > Summer of Code that would begin adding better integration on Windows (namely > in IDEs, but some of this would likely require better hooks for post-review > in Windows).
In my opinion, the first Windows integration work should be integration with Explorer: it is ubiquitous, so it is the best bang for buck. > It's possible that now, with post-review existing inside the rbtools > package, we could add a flag for graphical output that would, using some > standard toolkit, notify people of errors or successes, and then when > installed on Windows it would register entries for hooking post-review up to > the context menu. It probably wouldn't be a ton of work. The advantage of > this is that it keeps the code in the same place, and it's possible to > generate setup.exe files for a Python package. Sure. Having post-review packaged separately is certainly a step in the right direction. > If you could file a feature request for this, it will help us track it. http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=998 Cheers. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "reviewboard" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
