I don't see any reason why we shouldn't do this. Accountability is a good thing.
On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 8:41 PM, Paul Scott<psc...@vmware.com> wrote:
> Hmm... I don't know about that. I mean, if you really wanted to try and stick
> unique identifiers in your p4 commands so you could track which ones were
> currently pending, I guess you could, but I assume your Perforce
> administrators would get cranky at you. ;) Also, I don't really know how
> feasible that would be for showing progress... I mean, all you get from
> monitor is what processes are still alive, and how long they've been running.
> Maybe I misunderstood where you were going with that.
> The main purpose of throwing in a -zprog is just to make things a little
> prettier on the Perforce side. It lets you identify your application to the
> server, so logs and monitor output will display that instead of a generic
> "p4" (for post-review) or whatever the p4 python api reports (for Review
> Board). Mostly this is just a way of playing nice in the general Perforce
> environment. Though this might also allow RB admins who also have access to
> Perforce server logs to get a better sense of how they are affecting or being
> affected by Perforce performance. (There may be other ways of identifying
> Review Board in logs depending on your configuration--user, RB server
> IP--though probably not for post-review).
> This wouldn't be a huge change (just tack that on to p4 commands, and set
> something in the p4python connection object) and I would think the only major
> reason not to do it is if people didn't really want Review Board reported as
> reviewboard or similar in their Perforce logs.
> -- Paul
> From: firstname.lastname@example.org [reviewbo...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
> Of Christian Hammond [chip...@chipx86.com]
> Sent: Saturday, June 13, 2009 4:32 PM
> To: email@example.com
> Subject: Re: Report application name to Perforce using -zprog?
> So this would allow for reporting progress on, say, file fetches from
> Perforce? Something like that would be interesting for displaying progresses
> on rendering diffs, but would be a lot of work. We'd need to find a good use
> case for it and implement things in a way where our code could take advantage
> of this information without requiring (for all the other SCMs).
> Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com<mailto:chip...@chipx86.com>
> Review Board - http://www.review-board.org
> VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com
> On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 4:35 PM, Paul Scott
> <psc...@vmware.com<mailto:psc...@vmware.com>> wrote:
> Hey Review Boarders,
> My team uses the -zprog global option with a few major internal
> scripts/applications to help better track usage patterns. (If you're
> unfamiliar with -zprog, you can read about it here:
> I was thinking about adding this to our Review Board and post-review.
> How/where I implement this will be a little bit different based on whether
> this is a customization or something I intend to submit as a patch, so I
> wanted to see if this is something folks would like Review Board to do, or
> not like Review Board to do, or what.
> Paul Scott
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
To post to this group, send email to firstname.lastname@example.org
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
For more options, visit this group at