I am using 1.0.5.1

On Jan 25, 3:12 pm, Christian Hammond <chip...@chipx86.com> wrote:
> What version of Git are you using?
>
> Christian
>
> --
> Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
> Review Board -http://www.reviewboard.org
> VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 10:13 AM, Kunjal <kunjal.par...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I just try to post the review.
>
> > my git branch -a shows:
> >  git branch -a
> >  donut
> > * kunjal
>
> > postreview.py --parent=origin/donut
> > Failed to execute command: ['git', 'diff', '--no-color', '--full-
> > index', 'master']
> > fatal: ambiguous argument 'master': unknown revision or path not in
> > the working tree.
> > Use '--' to separate paths from revisions
>
> > On Jan 25, 9:48 am, Kunjal <kunjal.par...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Thanks a lot.
>
> > > One question...
>
> > > In the Add repository dialog, I have provided repository path as
> > > git://mobcom-git.sj.broadcom.com/git_repos. Is that correct?
>
> > > We have our all repositories stored at /projects/xxx/xxx/git_repos.
>
> > > Also, on the local workspace, user must do --> git config
> > > reviewboard.urlhttp://reviewboard.example.com
> > > This could be part of .cshrc file so every user does not have to do it
> > > all the time.
>
> > > After I do 2 above steps, am I ready to post-review or some more
> > > config is needed? I am using nigthlies as of Jan25.
>
> > > Kunjal
>
> > > On Jan 24, 5:20 pm, Christian Hammond <chip...@chipx86.com> wrote:
>
> > > > Hi,
>
> > > > Git support in Review Board 1.1 (soon to be renamed 1.5) is much better
> > than
> > > > in 1.0.x. Git has no concept of checking out individual files from a
> > remote
> > > > repository, so in 1.0.x, you need to make sure that you have a
> > repository on
> > > > a filesystem accessible from the Review Board server and it needs to be
> > > > constantly up-to-date with a master repository.
>
> > > > In 1.5, if you have a web-based repository viewer set up for your Git
> > > > repository (such as cgit, gitweb, GitHub, etc.) then you can specify a
> > path
> > > > to a "raw file" URL that provides a raw checkout of the file based on
> > > > revision and filename. Review Board will use this to grab the files
> > instead
> > > > of needing a local checkout. It's much easier to maintain, and we're
> > going
> > > > to recommend this route going forward.
>
> > > > As for post-review, it's had Git support for a long time. I imagine
> > your
> > > > copy is just out of date. The class should be named "GitClient." The
> > > > nightles are preferred for Git, though, as there's a number of
> > important
> > > > fixes for determining parent branches. I plan to cut a release soon.
>
> > > > To run post-review with Git, you can just type `post-review` and it
> > will
> > > > generate a diff from the origin to HEAD. If you specify
> > > > --parent=<branchname> then it will generate from branchname to HEAD.
>
> > > > Christian
>
> > > > --
> > > > Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
> > > > Review Board -http://www.reviewboard.org
> > > > VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com
>
> > > > On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 5:11 PM, Kunjal <kunjal.par...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > > > Last question...
>
> > > > > Does the GIT support available in RB 1.0.5 or I have to move to RB
> > 1.1
> > > > > Alpha 2?
> > > > > Sorry for all these questions.
>
> > > > > On Jan 24, 12:04 pm, Kunjal <kunjal.par...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > One more thing...
> > > > > > The post-review script we have has the class called PerforceClient
> > > > > > which gets the repository info. and creates diff.
> > > > > > I do not see any class for GITClient.
> > > > > > Do I need to create such class on my own?
>
> > > > > > Thanks
> > > > > > Kunjal
>
> > > > > > On Jan 23, 11:10 am, Kunjal <kunjal.par...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > Hello Chris,
>
> > > > > > > We do have RB-Perforce integration working perfect!
> > > > > > > We want RB-GIT integration as well.
>
> > > > > > > Here are the steps I can think of. Can you evaluate it?
>
> > > > > > > 1. Add new repository for GIT in RB.
> > > > > > > 2. Install RB tools in Linux machines. We do have our own version
> > of
> > > > > > > post-review. can we just replace it?
> > > > > > > 3. what are the commands to be used to post review? For perforce,
> > we
> > > > > > > are using post-review.exe 234545
> > > > > > > For GIT, I have to give latest commit number? post-review
> > 0er545455 ?
> > > > > > > 4. Any other things I need to take care.
>
> > > > > > > Thanks for your help.
>
> > > > > > > Kunjal- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > > > > --
> > > > > Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
> > > > >http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
> > > > > Happy user? Let us know athttp://www.reviewboard.org/users/
> > > > > -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
> > > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > > > > reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<reviewboard%2bunsubscr...@googlegr­oups.com>
> > <reviewboard%2bunsubscr...@googlegr­­oups.com>
> > > > > For more options, visit this group at
> > > > >http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en-Hidequoted text -
>
> > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > --
> > Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
> >http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
> > Happy user? Let us know athttp://www.reviewboard.org/users/
> > -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<reviewboard%2bunsubscr...@googlegr­oups.com>
> > For more options, visit this group at
> >http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

Reply via email to