So what I'm seeing is that some of these evolutions that have been applied are recorded as having already been applied. That most often happens when you've done an upgrade, then tried reverting the schema for some reason (perhaps to downgrade) but never erased the evolution history. You say the database wasn't modified, but did anything ever happen beyond just upgrading from one release to another?
What database are you using? What version of Review Board did you have installed prior to 1.6 beta 1? Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 1:02 PM, martin <martin.don...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks Christian. > > Screenshot: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/9410307/evolutions.PNG > > #----- Evolution for sessions > from django_evolution.mutations import * > from django.db import models > > MUTATIONS = [ > ChangeField('Session', 'expire_date', initial=None, db_index=True) > ] > #---------------------- > #----- Evolution for accounts > from django_evolution.mutations import * > from django.db import models > > MUTATIONS = [ > AddField('Profile', 'is_private', models.BooleanField, > initial=False) > ] > #---------------------- > #----- Evolution for reviews > from django_evolution.mutations import * > from django.db import models > > MUTATIONS = [ > AddField('Comment', 'issue_opened', models.BooleanField, > initial=False), > AddField('Comment', 'issue_status', models.CharField, > max_length=1, null=True, db_index=True), > AddField('Group', 'local_site', models.ForeignKey, null=True, > related_model='site.LocalSite'), > AddField('Group', 'incoming_request_count', models.CounterField, > null=True), > AddField('Group', 'visible', models.BooleanField, initial=True), > AddField('Group', 'invite_only', models.BooleanField, > initial=False), > ChangeField('Group', 'name', initial=None, unique=False), > AddField('Review', 'file_attachment_comments', > models.ManyToManyField, > related_model='reviews.FileAttachmentComment'), > AddField('ReviewRequestDraft', 'inactive_file_attachments', > models.ManyToManyField, related_model='attachments.FileAttachment'), > AddField('ReviewRequestDraft', 'file_attachments', > models.ManyToManyField, related_model='attachments.FileAttachment'), > AddField('ReviewRequest', 'inactive_file_attachments', > models.ManyToManyField, related_model='attachments.FileAttachment'), > AddField('ReviewRequest', 'local_site', models.ForeignKey, > null=True, related_model='site.LocalSite'), > AddField('ReviewRequest', 'local_id', models.IntegerField, > null=True), > AddField('ReviewRequest', 'file_attachments', > models.ManyToManyField, related_model='attachments.FileAttachment'), > AddField('DefaultReviewer', 'local_site', models.ForeignKey, > null=True, related_model='site.LocalSite'), > AddField('ScreenshotComment', 'issue_opened', models.BooleanField, > initial=False), > AddField('ScreenshotComment', 'issue_status', models.CharField, > max_length=1, null=True, db_index=True) > ] > #---------------------- > #----- Evolution for scmtools > from django_evolution.mutations import * > from django.db import models > > MUTATIONS = [ > AddField('Repository', 'review_groups', models.ManyToManyField, > related_model='reviews.Group'), > AddField('Repository', 'local_site', models.ForeignKey, null=True, > related_model='site.LocalSite'), > AddField('Repository', 'public', models.BooleanField, > initial=True), > AddField('Repository', 'users', models.ManyToManyField, > related_model='auth.User'), > ChangeField('Repository', 'path', initial=None, unique=False), > ChangeField('Repository', 'name', initial=None, unique=False) > ] > #---------------------- > Trial evolution successful. > Run './manage.py evolve --hint --execute' to apply evolution. > > > On Jun 29, 12:20 pm, Christian Hammond <chip...@chipx86.com> wrote: > > Those were added before beta 1, but I think the error may be misleading. > It > > mentions "sessions", which is Django-supplied. > > > > Can you run: > > > > $ rb-site manage /path/to/site evolve -- --hint > > > > (Do not run --hint --execute if anyone tells you to) > > > > Show me the results of that. > > > > Then, go into the admin UI -> Database -> Evolutions and screenshot that > for > > me. I need to see the entire list. You can send that privately, but it > > shouldn't have any confidential info. > > > > Christian > > > > -- > > Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com > > Review Board -http://www.reviewboard.org > > VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 11:54 AM, martin <martin.don...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > When I run rb-site upgrade /my/site I get the following: > > > > > === > > > Rebuilding directory structure > > > Updating database. This may take a while. > > > Creating tables ... > > > Upgrading Review Board from 1.6 beta 1 to 1.6 RC1 > > > There are unapplied evolutions for sessions. > > > There are unapplied evolutions for accounts. > > > There are unapplied evolutions for reviews. > > > Project signature has changed - an evolution is required > > > Installing custom SQL ... > > > Installing indexes ... > > > No fixtures found. > > > /usr/local/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/pycrypto-2.3-py2.6-linux- > > > x86_64.egg/Crypto/Util/randpool.py:40: RandomPool_DeprecationWarning: > > > This application uses RandomPool, which is BROKEN in older releases. > > > Seehttp://www.pycrypto.org/randpool-broken > > > RandomPool_DeprecationWarning) > > > The stored evolutions do not completely resolve all model changes. > > > Run `./manage.py evolve --hint` to see a suggestion for the changes > > > required. > > > > > The following are the changes that could not be resolved: > > > In model reviews.DefaultReviewer: > > > Field 'local_site' has been added > > > In model reviews.ReviewRequest: > > > Field 'local_site' has been added > > > Field 'local_id' has been added > > > In model reviews.Group: > > > Field 'local_site' has been added > > > Field 'incoming_request_count' has been added > > > Field 'visible' has been added > > > Field 'invite_only' has been added > > > In field 'name': > > > Property 'unique' has changed > > > In model scmtools.Repository: > > > Field 'review_groups' has been added > > > Field 'local_site' has been added > > > Field 'public' has been added > > > Field 'users' has been added > > > In field 'path': > > > Property 'unique' has changed > > > In field 'name': > > > Property 'unique' has changed > > > Error: Your models contain changes that Django Evolution cannot > > > resolve automatically. > > > === > > > > > I haven't made any modifications to the DB structure myself between > > > beta1 and rc1. This upgrade did also include and upgrade from django > > > 1.2.5 to django 1.3, not sure if that effects anything. Can anyone > > > suggest how I would go about resolving this? > > > > > -- > > > Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at > > >http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ > > > Happy user? Let us know athttp://www.reviewboard.org/users/ > > > -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~--- > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > > reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > > > For more options, visit this group at > > >http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en > > -- > Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at > http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ > Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ > -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~--- > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en > -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
