Ugh. Bad wording. It means what you'd hope it would mean. We had an unconditional usage of the modpython handler in Django, which could break if no mod_python support existed on the system.
We don't require Pygments 1.4 to run, but we do require it for installing through setup.py. You can package it without it. However, this is something I suspect we'll hit a lot more in the future. While we work on 2.0, we'll likely put out many more 1.6 releases, rather than work toward new 1.x releases. Some of these may bump up our dependencies to work around bugs, improve performance, or introduce new functionality we may require. I imagine that'll make things more difficult for packaging. Christian On Monday, August 22, 2011, Stephen Gallagher <step...@gallagherhome.com> wrote: > On Sat, 2011-08-20 at 03:42 -0700, Christian Hammond wrote: >> Hi everyone, >> >> I just put out Review Board 1.5.6, which has many bug fixes and some >> performance improvements for users who have been running RB for a >> while. >> >> News post is up at >> http://www.reviewboard.org/news/2011/08/20/review-board-156-released/ > > > Christian, can you please elaborate on the following: > > "Review Board now requires Pygments 1.4 or higher. Older installations > running older versions of Pygments should get a performance increase > when rendering diffs." > > > It's confusing, because you state that it now requires 1.4, then > immediately follow with "older versions of Pygments should get a > performance increase". I *think* you're saying that "older versions of > Pygments updated to 1.4 should get a performance increase", but it's not > clear. > > Is it no longer possible to run Review Board against an older version of > Pygments? (i.e. if I manually removed the version requirement from the > egg). I'm trying to package Review Board for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 > (in the EPEL repositories), but RHEL 6 (and 6.1) includes > python-pygments 1.1.1. > > > > > Also, can you please rephrase: > "Using Review Board with wsgi without mod_python installed on the system > no longer prevents Review Board from breaking" > > I'm not sure what this sentence is trying to say, but the phrase "no > longer prevents Review Board from breaking" makes me nervous :) > > -- > Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ > Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ > -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~--- > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
