Now I get this error:

(1054, "Unknown column 'reviews_reviewrequest.local_site_id' in 'on clause'")

Request Method:GETRequest URL:https://crush/dashboard/Django 
Version:1.4.5Exception 
Type:DatabaseErrorException Value:

(1054, "Unknown column 'reviews_reviewrequest.local_site_id' in 'on clause'")

Exception 
Location:/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/MySQL_python-1.2.3-py2.6-linux-x86_64.egg/MySQLdb/connections.py
 
in defaulterrorhandler, line 36Python Executable:/usr/bin/pythonPython 
Version:2.6.6Python Path:

['/var/www/reviewboard/conf',
 '/usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/JCC-2.14-py2.6-linux-x86_64.egg',
 '/usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/lucene-3.6.1-py2.6-linux-x86_64.egg',
 '/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/distribute-0.6.27-py2.6.egg',
 '/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/MySQL_python-1.2.3-py2.6-linux-x86_64.egg',
 '/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/recaptcha_client-1.0.6-py2.6.egg',
 '/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/python_dateutil-1.5-py2.6.egg',
 '/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/flup-1.0.3.dev_20110405-py2.6.egg',
 '/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Pygments-1.5-py2.6.egg',
 '/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/PIL-1.1.7-py2.6-linux-x86_64.egg',
 '/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/pycrypto-2.6-py2.6-linux-x86_64.egg',
 '/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/feedparser-5.1.3-py2.6.egg',
 '/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.7.6-py2.6.egg',
 '/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/pytz-2012j-py2.6.egg',
 '/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/paramiko-1.9.0-py2.6.egg',
 '/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/mimeparse-0.1.3-py2.6.egg',
 '/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Markdown-2.2.1-py2.6.egg',
 '/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/docutils-0.10-py2.6.egg',
 '/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/django_pipeline-1.2.24-py2.6.egg',
 '/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Djblets-0.7.11-py2.6.egg',
 '/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Django-1.4.5-py2.6.egg',
 '/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/django_evolution-0.6.9alpha0.dev-py2.6.egg',
 '/usr/lib64/python26.zip',
 '/usr/lib64/python2.6',
 '/usr/lib64/python2.6/plat-linux2',
 '/usr/lib64/python2.6/lib-tk',
 '/usr/lib64/python2.6/lib-old',
 '/usr/lib64/python2.6/lib-dynload',
 '/usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages',
 '/usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/gst-0.10',
 '/usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/gtk-2.0',
 '/usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/webkit-1.0',
 '/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages']



Maybe I should try on a fresh database.

--Steve

On Friday, March 1, 2013 11:26:36 AM UTC-8, Christian Hammond wrote:
>
> That's the wrong Django Evolution. Can you try downloading the one from 
> that URL and just passing it directly to easy_install?
>
> Christian
>
> -- 
> Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com <javascript:>
> Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
> VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com 
>
> On Mar 1, 2013, at 11:20 AM, Steve <seide...@gmail.com <javascript:>> 
> wrote:
>
> Sorry for the long, messy output, here's what happened when I tested the 
> fix. This is an attempt to upgrade a 1.5.5 database to 1.7.6.
>
> [root@crush]~/ReviewBoard# easy_install -U django_evolution -f 
> http://downloads.reviewboard.org/temp/django-evolution/
> Searching for django-evolution
> Reading http://pypi.python.org/simple/django_evolution/
> Reading http://code.google.com/p/django-evolution/
> Best match: django-evolution 0.6.8
> Downloading 
> http://pypi.python.org/packages/2.6/d/django_evolution/django_evolution-0.6.8-py2.6.egg#md5=7527e0ca398639c87b68969ceb1cd2d7
> Processing django_evolution-0.6.8-py2.6.egg
> removing 
> '/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/django_evolution-0.6.8-py2.6.egg' (and 
> everything under it)
> creating /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/django_evolution-0.6.8-py2.6.egg
> Extracting django_evolution-0.6.8-py2.6.egg to 
> /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages
> django-evolution 0.6.8 is already the active version in easy-install.pth
>
> Installed /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/django_evolution-0.6.8-py2.6.egg
> Processing dependencies for django-evolution
> Finished processing dependencies for django-evolution
> Searching for -f
> Reading http://pypi.python.org/simple/-f/
> Couldn't find index page for '-f' (maybe misspelled?)
> Scanning index of all packages (this may take a while)
> Reading http://pypi.python.org/simple/
>   C-c C-c^Cinterrupted
>
> I don't know why easy_install got confused by '-f', but I did get a new 
> django_evolution, so I tried updating my broken site:
>
> [root@crush]~/ReviewBoard# cat rb-upgrade.log
> Error: Model 'reviews.FileAttachmentComment' already has a field named 
> 'extra_data'
> Rebuilding directory structure
> Updating database. This may take a while.
>
> The log output below, including warnings and errors,
> can be ignored unless upgrade fails.
>
> ------------------ <begin log output> ------------------
> Creating tables ...
> There are unapplied evolutions for auth.
> There are unapplied evolutions for accounts.
> There are unapplied evolutions for changedescs.
> There are unapplied evolutions for diffviewer.
> There are unapplied evolutions for reviews.
> There are unapplied evolutions for scmtools.
> Project signature has changed - an evolution is required
> Installing custom SQL ...
> Installing indexes ...
> Installed 0 object(s) from 0 fixture(s)
>
> Now when I log in to my site, I get this:
>
> (1054, "Unknown column 'accounts_profile.is_private' in 'field list'")
>
> Request Method:GETRequest URL:https://crush/Django Version:1.4.5Exception 
> Type:DatabaseErrorException Value:
>
> (1054, "Unknown column 'accounts_profile.is_private' in 'field list'")
>
> Exception 
> Location:/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/MySQL_python-1.2.3-py2.6-linux-x86_64.egg/MySQLdb/connections.py
>  
> in defaulterrorhandler, line 36Python Executable:/usr/bin/pythonPython 
> Version:2.6.6Python Path:
>
> ['/var/www/reviewboard/conf',
>  '/usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/JCC-2.14-py2.6-linux-x86_64.egg',
>  '/usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/lucene-3.6.1-py2.6-linux-x86_64.egg',
>  '/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/distribute-0.6.27-py2.6.egg',
>  '/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/MySQL_python-1.2.3-py2.6-linux-x86_64.egg',
>  '/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/recaptcha_client-1.0.6-py2.6.egg',
>  '/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/python_dateutil-1.5-py2.6.egg',
>  '/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/flup-1.0.3.dev_20110405-py2.6.egg',
>  '/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Pygments-1.5-py2.6.egg',
>  '/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/PIL-1.1.7-py2.6-linux-x86_64.egg',
>  '/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/pycrypto-2.6-py2.6-linux-x86_64.egg',
>  '/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/feedparser-5.1.3-py2.6.egg',
>  '/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.7.6-py2.6.egg',
>  '/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/pytz-2012j-py2.6.egg',
>  '/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/paramiko-1.9.0-py2.6.egg',
>  '/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/mimeparse-0.1.3-py2.6.egg',
>  '/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Markdown-2.2.1-py2.6.egg',
>  '/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/docutils-0.10-py2.6.egg',
>  '/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/django_pipeline-1.2.24-py2.6.egg',
>  '/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Djblets-0.7.11-py2.6.egg',
>  '/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Django-1.4.5-py2.6.egg',
>  '/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/django_evolution-0.6.8-py2.6.egg',
>  '/usr/lib64/python26.zip',
>  '/usr/lib64/python2.6',
>  '/usr/lib64/python2.6/plat-linux2',
>  '/usr/lib64/python2.6/lib-tk',
>  '/usr/lib64/python2.6/lib-old',
>  '/usr/lib64/python2.6/lib-dynload',
>  '/usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages',
>  '/usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/gst-0.10',
>  '/usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/gtk-2.0',
>  '/usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/webkit-1.0',
>  '/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages']
>
> Server time:Fri, 1 Mar 2013 19:08:48 +0000
>
>
> I may try it again on a pristine 1.5.5 database.
>
> --Steve
>
> On Wednesday, February 27, 2013 12:16:03 AM UTC-8, Christian Hammond wrote:
>>
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> So some of you have hit database upgrade issues before when upgrading to 
>> 1.7 (or, in some cases, 1.6). We've managed to figure out solutions for 
>> some of you, but not all.
>>
>> I've spent a lot of time trying to figure out solutions, find the common 
>> cases, and figure out a fix. Today, I have one that should fix it for at 
>> least some of you. What I really need are volunteers to help test it.
>>
>> If you're having issues now, or have had issues in the past and still 
>> have a broken database dump handy, I'd appreciate your help. Heck, even if 
>> you have had no issues, and have an old database dump to test.
>>
>> I have a test version of Django Evolution up at 
>> http://downloads.reviewboard.org/temp/django-evolution/
>>
>> This version has some new logic that tries to avoid applying database 
>> upgrades for things that are already in the database, which was the core 
>> problem most of you hit.
>>
>> If you can give this a try, here's what I'd like you to do:
>>
>> 1) Get an installation going with your broken or pre-upgrade database.
>>
>> 2) Install django_evolution from the above URL, using:
>>
>>     $ sudo easy_install -U django_evolution -f 
>> http://downloads.reviewboard.org/temp/django-evolution/
>>
>> 3) Attempt a Review Board upgrade (rb-site manage /path/to/site upgrade)
>>
>> 4) Assuming it works, try to access the site and make sure things 
>> generally work on it.
>>
>>
>> Please then reply to this post with the following information:
>>
>> 1) The complete log output.
>>
>> 2) Whether you were testing with a dump from before a past broken upgrade 
>> attempt, or a dump made after that past upgrade attempt failed.
>>
>>
>> For extra credit, if you have did have a working database dump, 
>> sanity-checking that you don't have any upgrade problems and that the site 
>> runs would also really help me out.
>>
>> Thanks! Sooner I get some feedback, the sooner I can put this problem to 
>> rest.
>>
>> - Christian
>>
>> -- 
>> Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com
>> Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
>> VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com 
>>
>>
> -- 
> Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
> http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
> Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
> -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> reviewboard...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>
> For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
> --- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "reviewboard" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>  
>  
>
>
>

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"reviewboard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to