Hi Christian, sorry for the late reply, totally missed your last email.
the version of RBT is 0.7.6 and the perforce version is P4/LINUX26X86_64/2016.1/1404799. The account of Perforce that we use for creating the review was different from the owner of the changelist, this could be maybe a valid point why the correct error message was not raised, unluckly i cannot send you the files. Cheers, Max On Wednesday, 17 August 2016 22:04:41 UTC+1, Christian Hammond wrote: > > Hi Max, > > I'm very sorry you lost time and productivity due to this. I know how that > goes.. > > We have code that's supposed to be doing the right thing for submitted > changesets. I don't know why it failed on your end. In fact, if the > changeset was marked as submitted, you should have seen the log entry: > "Generating diff for range of submitted changes". > > I think what's happening is that the change number provided was found to > be invalid for some reason, and this error internally was raised, but then > swallowed unintentionally. > > Can you let me know what versions of RBTools and Perforce you're using, > and can you confirm that the changeset being referenced is owned by the > same Perforce account that you'd see if creating a new changeset? > > Is there a way you'd be able to share that changeset with me? (Filenames > and description text could be masked) > > Christian > > -- > Christian Hammond > President/CEO of Beanbag <https://www.beanbaginc.com/> > Makers of Review Board <https://www.reviewboard.org/> > > On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 4:29 AM, <[email protected] <javascript:>> > wrote: > >> Hi Christian, >> >> i was simply running rbt post --debug <changelist>, but i got the >> solution for this problem: simply, the changelist that i was using for >> creating a review was already submitted, IMHO the error message is not >> helpful at all and it should be rewrite for give to the user an hint of >> what it could be wrong, in this case i just lost 2 hours for >> googling/search for a solution to a non-existent problem. >> >> Cheers, >> Max >> >> On Wednesday, 17 August 2016 11:21:27 UTC+1, Christian Hammond wrote: >>> >>> Hi Max, >>> >>> The "base path" is something that Subversion and Bazaar need, but not >>> Perforce. You can safely ignore that. >>> >>> Can you show me how you're running rbt post? >>> >>> Christian >>> >>> -- >>> Christian Hammond >>> President/CEO of Beanbag <https://www.beanbaginc.com/> >>> Makers of Review Board <https://www.reviewboard.org/> >>> >>> On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 3:15 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi all, >>>> >>>> we got a weird problem while using rbt, we did a backup of the machine >>>> that host rbt and it changed some permission of the folders, now >>>> everything >>>> is as it was but when i try to use rbt post <changeset> (that always >>>> worked) it return me the error : >>>> >>>> Path <Changeset> does not match a valid Perforce path. >>>>> >>>> >>>> the debug output say this: >>>> >>>> >>> Running on Linux-4.4.0-34-generic-x86_64-with-Ubuntu-16.04-xenial >>>> >>> Home = /home/path >>>> >>> Current directory = /home/path/folder >>>> >>> Checking for a Subversion repository... >>>> >>> Unable to execute "svn help": skipping SVN >>>> >>> Checking for a Git repository... >>>> >>> Unable to execute "git --help" or "git.cmd --help": skipping Git >>>> >>> Checking for a Mercurial repository... >>>> >>> Unable to execute "hg --help": skipping Mercurial >>>> >>> Checking for a CVS repository... >>>> >>> Unable to execute "cvs": skipping CVS >>>> >>> Checking for a Perforce repository... >>>> >>> Running: p4 -c server info >>>> >>> Running: diff --version >>>> >>> repository info: Path: server:1666, Base path: None, Supports >>>> changesets: True >>>> >>> Making HTTP GET request to http://localhost/api/ >>>> >>> Running: p4 -c server info >>>> Path '31414' does not match a valid Perforce path. >>>> >>>> from what i see the base path is null, so maybe the rbt is expecting >>>> that i pass it as an argument? This basepath is refer to my local perforce >>>> folder or the server root? How can i set it? >>>> >>>> Many thanks, >>>> Max >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: >>>> https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ >>>> Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: >>>> https://rbcommons.com/ >>>> Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/ >>>> --- >>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>> Groups "reviewboard" group. >>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>>> an email to [email protected]. >>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>>> >>> >>> > -- Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "reviewboard" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
