-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/51815/#review150976
-----------------------------------------------------------


Ship it!




Ship It!

- Alejandro Fernandez


On Sept. 30, 2016, 12:39 a.m., Amruta Borkar wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/51815/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Sept. 30, 2016, 12:39 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Ambari, Shantanu Mundkur, Di Li, Jayush Luniya, Juanjo  
> Marron, Laszlo Puskas, and Robert Nettleton.
> 
> 
> Bugs: AMBARI-18355
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMBARI-18355
> 
> 
> Repository: ambari
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Currently stack definitions do not list conditional dependencies, adding 
> those to the stack definitions would make it easy to validate errors in case 
> of blueprint deployment. Please refer to document attached to Jira
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   
> ambari-server/src/main/java/org/apache/ambari/server/state/DependencyConditionInfo.java
>  PRE-CREATION 
>   
> ambari-server/src/main/java/org/apache/ambari/server/state/DependencyInfo.java
>  e3db662 
>   
> ambari-server/src/main/java/org/apache/ambari/server/topology/BlueprintValidatorImpl.java
>  a5f33ff 
>   
> ambari-server/src/main/resources/common-services/HDFS/2.1.0.2.0/metainfo.xml 
> 65d166a 
>   
> ambari-server/src/test/java/org/apache/ambari/server/topology/BlueprintValidatorImplTest.java
>  b1de8ef 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/51815/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Written Junit test cases. Perfomred manual testing to check the Namenode HA 
> component dependency. Was able to proceed with the installation for valid 
> blueprint. and got validation error message while registering blueprint when 
> the Blueprint did not satisfy the conditional dependencies.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Amruta Borkar
> 
>

Reply via email to