-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/29117/#review72291
-----------------------------------------------------------



docs/thrift-deprecation.md
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/29117/#comment118378>

    Sorry I missed this first review, but AFAIK this isn't true for dynamic 
languages (incl. our own scheduler UI)?


- David McLaughlin


On Feb. 13, 2015, 12:35 a.m., Maxim Khutornenko wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/29117/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Feb. 13, 2015, 12:35 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Aurora and Bill Farner.
> 
> 
> Bugs: AURORA-973
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AURORA-973
> 
> 
> Repository: aurora
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> This is a first stab at documenting thrift deprecation. Any 
> suggestions/comments are welcome.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   docs/developing-aurora-client.md e002d908ce07020513fa06c7e70c41f9e2f55b1d 
>   docs/developing-aurora-scheduler.md 
> 7f6cc2e6c8e01115a9b7a7dc7633bcd88ba02a0f 
>   docs/thrift-deprecation.md PRE-CREATION 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/29117/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> https://github.com/maxim111333/incubator-aurora/blob/populated_deprecation/docs/thrift-deprecation.md
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Maxim Khutornenko
> 
>

Reply via email to