pkuwm commented on pull request #1199:
URL: https://github.com/apache/helix/pull/1199#issuecomment-667440493


   > The movement of the classes is logically not what we intended to do. We do 
want them in the common package. Let's think about better way to do it. But 
glad to know there are not many classes impacted.
   
   @jiajunwang 
   For current structure, helix-common is actually redundant as only helix-core 
depends on helix-common. And helix-common has the same package paths with 
helix-core. That being said, it is totally fine to just merge helix-common to 
helix-core. With current structure, I don't see a value that we have 
helix-common but only adds redundancy.
   
   The only movement of classes is in metrics-common. The purpose is to clearly 
give a dedicated package path for metrics-common and cleanly avoid exporting 
classes of metrics-common to helix-core.jar.
   
   I 100% agree that we should bring up a good plan to clean up the structure. 
This is what I would like to push forward to make helix code structure clear. 
And I believe you do, as well, and you possibly have an idea to restructure 
code base. :) 


----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to