Alex Behm has posted comments on this change.

Change subject: IMPALA-4423: Correct but conservative implementation of 
Subquery.equals().
......................................................................


Patch Set 1:

(3 comments)

Thanks for the quick CR!

http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/4923/1//COMMIT_MSG
Commit Message:

PS1, Line 15: Corrected an existing test
> Hm, didn't seen any changes in the result plans, only the modifications in 
Added a CR comment in the .test file to point you to the changes.


http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/4923/1/fe/src/main/java/org/apache/impala/analysis/Subquery.java
File fe/src/main/java/org/apache/impala/analysis/Subquery.java:

Line 154:    * conservative and only considers Subqueries equal if their 
toSql() matches.
> Maybe also emphasize that equivalent statements will not be considered equa
Done


http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/4923/1/testdata/workloads/functional-planner/queries/PlannerTest/subquery-rewrite.test
File 
testdata/workloads/functional-planner/queries/PlannerTest/subquery-rewrite.test:

Line 1771
This existing test case expected incorrect results because the last subquery 
should evaluate to FALSE and we should have an EmptySet plan - but we have a 
scan here. Instead of changing the expected results, I changed the query to 
cover an additional interesting case that matches the currently expected plan.

I also modified the test right above here for some extra coverage. Notice that 
the subquery there is the same one as the one modified here.

I now also added a new test at the bottom straight from the JIRA.


-- 
To view, visit http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/4923
To unsubscribe, visit http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/settings

Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Gerrit-Change-Id: I5562d98ce36507aa5e253323e184fd42b54f27ed
Gerrit-PatchSet: 1
Gerrit-Project: Impala-ASF
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Owner: Alex Behm <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Alex Behm <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Dimitris Tsirogiannis <[email protected]>
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes

Reply via email to