Mike Percy has posted comments on this change. ( 
http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/8586 )

Change subject: WIP [client] expose non-voter replicas for kudu CLI tool
......................................................................


Patch Set 1:

(4 comments)

Looks alright to me until we can figure out how we want to expose this in the 
public client API

http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/8586/1/src/kudu/client/meta_cache.h
File src/kudu/client/meta_cache.h:

http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/8586/1/src/kudu/client/meta_cache.h@372
PS1, Line 372: bool show_non_voters = false
perhaps make this an enum? SHOW_NON_VOTERS / HIDE_NON_VOTERS

Also this doesn't need to be explicit and it's probably best to get rid of the 
default value in the constructor


http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/8586/1/src/kudu/tools/ksck_remote.cc
File src/kudu/tools/ksck_remote.cc:

http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/8586/1/src/kudu/tools/ksck_remote.cc@318
PS1, Line 318: show_non_voters_
might be a little friendlier to make this a setter method


http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/8586/1/src/kudu/tools/tool_action_table.cc
File src/kudu/tools/tool_action_table.cc:

http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/8586/1/src/kudu/tools/tool_action_table.cc@64
PS1, Line 64: show_non_voters_
it would be less hacky to use a setter on Data for this


http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/8586/1/src/kudu/tools/tool_action_table.cc@87
PS1, Line 87: is_voter_
mind putting a getter on this?



--
To view, visit http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/8586
To unsubscribe, visit http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/settings

Gerrit-Project: kudu
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Gerrit-Change-Id: I19317fdf5a2d5c8bb5f37b27bb83067a4df4ea20
Gerrit-Change-Number: 8586
Gerrit-PatchSet: 1
Gerrit-Owner: Alexey Serbin <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Kudu Jenkins
Gerrit-Reviewer: Mike Percy <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Tidy Bot
Gerrit-Reviewer: Will Berkeley <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2017 08:55:15 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes

Reply via email to