Hao Hao has posted comments on this change. ( 
http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/9526 )

Change subject: A new Jepsen checker for READ_YOUR_WRITES scan mode
......................................................................


Patch Set 10:

(16 comments)

http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/9526/8/java/kudu-jepsen/src/main/clojure/jepsen/kudu/sets.clj
File java/kudu-jepsen/src/main/clojure/jepsen/kudu/sets.clj:

http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/9526/8/java/kudu-jepsen/src/main/clojure/jepsen/kudu/sets.clj@59
PS8, Line 59:
> same
Done


http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/9526/8/java/kudu-jepsen/src/main/clojure/jepsen/kudu/sets.clj@59
PS8, Line 59: lude [test])
> why doesn't the shorthand used in the imports work ([clojure.core.reducers
Updated it in the latest patch.


http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/9526/9/java/kudu-jepsen/src/main/clojure/jepsen/kudu/sets.clj
File java/kudu-jepsen/src/main/clojure/jepsen/kudu/sets.clj:

http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/9526/9/java/kudu-jepsen/src/main/clojure/jepsen/kudu/sets.clj@25
PS9, Line 25: follow
> follows
Done


http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/9526/9/java/kudu-jepsen/src/main/clojure/jepsen/kudu/sets.clj@25
PS9, Line 25:  valid
> valid:
Done


http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/9526/9/java/kudu-jepsen/src/main/clojure/jepsen/kudu/sets.clj@36
PS9, Line 36:  invalid(
> invalid:
Done


http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/9526/9/java/kudu-jepsen/src/main/clojure/jepsen/kudu/sets.clj@38
PS9, Line 38: ;;   [{:type :invoke, :f :add, :value 1, :process 0}
            : ;;    {:type :ok, :f :add, :value 1, :process 0}
            : ;;    {:type :invoke, :f :add, :value 2, :process 0}
            : ;;    {:type :ok, :f :add, :value 2, :process 0}
            : ;;    {:type :invoke, :f :count, :value nil, :process 0}
            : ;;    {:type :ok, :f :count, :value 2, :process 0}
            : ;;    {:type :invoke, :f :count, :value nil, :process 1}
            : ;;    {:type :ok, :f :count, :value 2, :process 1}
            : ;;    {:type :invoke, :f :add, :value 13, :process 1}
            : ;:    {:type :ok, :f :add, :value 13, :process 1}
            : ;;    {:type :invoke, :f :add, :value 22, :process 0}
            : ;;    {:type :ok, :f :add, :value 22, :process 0}
            : ;;    {:type :invoke, :f :count, :value nil, :process 0}
            : ;;    {:type :ok, :f :count, :value 2, :process 0}
            : ;;    {:type :invoke, :f :add, :value 250, :process 1}
            : ;;    {:type :ok, :f :add, :value 250, :process 1}]
            : ;;
> why? what's the anomaly that the checker is flagging?
Because this history broke the first validation that 'the total row count of a 
shared table is greater than or equal to the count of successful writes 
performed by that client'. In L51, process 0 has successfully inserted 3 rows 
but only 2 rows have been read.

I will add more comment for it.


http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/9526/9/java/kudu-jepsen/src/main/clojure/jepsen/kudu/sets.clj@72
PS9, Line 72: ;; The add operation to be performed by the processes.
            : (defn add-op [] (->> (range)
            :                      (map (partial array-map
            :                                    :type :invoke
            :                                    :f :add
> Since you're talking about valid and invalid histories before this doesn't
Done


http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/9526/9/java/kudu-jepsen/src/main/clojure/jepsen/kudu/sets.clj@77
PS9, Line 77:                            
> docs: "The add operation to be performed by the processes"
Done


http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/9526/9/java/kudu-jepsen/src/main/clojure/jepsen/kudu/sets.clj@82
PS9, Line 82: (defn count-by-set
> docs: "The count operation to be performed by the processes"
Done


http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/9526/9/java/kudu-jepsen/src/main/clojure/jepsen/kudu/sets.clj@85
PS9, Line 85:
> you mean "and" right?
The input could be either a set of :add ops or a :count op. So I put 'or' here.


http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/9526/9/java/kudu-jepsen/src/main/clojure/jepsen/kudu/sets.clj@86
PS9, Line 86:
> same
Same as above.


http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/9526/9/java/kudu-jepsen/src/main/clojure/jepsen/kudu/sets.clj@101
PS9, Line 101:
> operations, making sure that:
Done


http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/9526/9/java/kudu-jepsen/src/main/clojure/jepsen/kudu/sets.clj@103
PS9, Line 103:
> sucessful
Done


http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/9526/9/java/kudu-jepsen/src/main/clojure/jepsen/kudu/sets.clj@104
PS9, Line 104: kv
> goes
Done


http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/9526/9/java/kudu-jepsen/src/main/clojure/jepsen/kudu/sets.clj@163
PS9, Line 163:
> rows of the table
Done


http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/9526/9/java/kudu-jepsen/src/main/clojure/jepsen/kudu/sets.clj@191
PS9, Line 191:
> counts
Done



--
To view, visit http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/9526
To unsubscribe, visit http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/settings

Gerrit-Project: kudu
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Gerrit-Change-Id: I92d5c0e3b91af58576eb6cd408d922ec7c0fef6c
Gerrit-Change-Number: 9526
Gerrit-PatchSet: 10
Gerrit-Owner: Hao Hao <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Alexey Serbin <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: David Ribeiro Alves <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Hao Hao <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Kudu Jenkins
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Tue, 08 May 2018 01:11:36 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes

Reply via email to