Alexey Serbin has posted comments on this change. ( 
http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/11498 )

Change subject: [tools] ksck checksums: Add KsckChecksummer class
......................................................................


Patch Set 3:

(7 comments)

http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/11498/3/src/kudu/tools/ksck_checksum.h
File src/kudu/tools/ksck_checksum.h:

http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/11498/3/src/kudu/tools/ksck_checksum.h@57
PS3, Line 57:   KsckChecksumOptions();
            :
            :   KsckChecksumOptions(std::vector<std::string> table_filters,
            :                       std::vector<std::string> tablet_id_filters);
            :
            :   KsckChecksumOptions(MonoDelta timeout,
            :                       int scan_concurrency,
            :                       bool use_snapshot,
            :                       uint64_t snapshot_timestamp);
            :
            :   KsckChecksumOptions(MonoDelta timeout,
            :                       int scan_concurrency,
            :                       bool use_snapshot,
            :                       uint64_t snapshot_timestamp,
            :                       std::vector<std::string> table_filters,
            :                       std::vector<std::string> tablet_id_filters);
Did you consider adding KsckCheckOptionsBuilder instead?


http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/11498/3/src/kudu/tools/ksck_checksum.h@186
PS3, Line 186: class KsckChecksummer {
nit: do you mind re-order the methods in the ksck_checksum.cc file to match 
their declaration order?


http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/11498/3/src/kudu/tools/ksck_checksum.h@188
PS3, Line 188: explicit KsckChecksummer(KsckCluster* cluster);
docs nit: does it make sense to add a note explaining that 'cluster' should be 
alive for the whole lifetime of an instance of this class?


http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/11498/3/src/kudu/tools/ksck_checksum.h@216
PS3, Line 216:   // NOTE: Even if this function returns a bad Status, 
'table_checksum_map'
             :   // and 'num_results' will still be populated using whatever 
results are
             :   // available.
Is that implementation detail is exposed because you want somebody to rely on 
this or that's more about implementation optimization?


http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/11498/3/src/kudu/tools/ksck_checksum.cc
File src/kudu/tools/ksck_checksum.cc:

http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/11498/3/src/kudu/tools/ksck_checksum.cc@186
PS3, Line 186:
spacing nit: this supposed to be 4 spaces


http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/11498/3/src/kudu/tools/ksck_checksum.cc@186
PS3, Line 186: cluster_(cluster) {
             :   CHECK(cluster);
nit: it might be

    : cluster_(CHECK_NOTNULL(cluster)) {
}


http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/11498/3/src/kudu/tools/ksck_checksum.cc@267
PS3, Line 267: string
nit: would 'auto' work here as well?



--
To view, visit http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/11498
To unsubscribe, visit http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/settings

Gerrit-Project: kudu
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Gerrit-Change-Id: I2016936eaa26fd6b499783e7d5d8f404816b37fa
Gerrit-Change-Number: 11498
Gerrit-PatchSet: 3
Gerrit-Owner: Will Berkeley <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Alexey Serbin <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Andrew Wong <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Attila Bukor <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Grant Henke <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Kudu Jenkins
Gerrit-Reviewer: Tidy Bot
Gerrit-Reviewer: Todd Lipcon <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Will Berkeley <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2018 21:25:18 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes

Reply via email to