Hao Hao has posted comments on this change. ( 
http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/11656 )

Change subject: [sentry] SentryAction
......................................................................


Patch Set 6:

(3 comments)

http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/11656/5/src/kudu/sentry/sentry_action-test.cc
File src/kudu/sentry/sentry_action-test.cc:

http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/11656/5/src/kudu/sentry/sentry_action-test.cc@53
PS5, Line 53:
> This would be simpler as a vector<SentryAction>, since it could use an inti
Done


http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/11656/5/src/kudu/sentry/sentry_action.h
File src/kudu/sentry/sentry_action.h:

http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/11656/5/src/kudu/sentry/sentry_action.h@76
PS5, Line 76:   bool Imply(const SentryAction& other) const;
> Can this be const?
Done


http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/11656/5/src/kudu/sentry/sentry_action.cc
File src/kudu/sentry/sentry_action.cc:

http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/11656/5/src/kudu/sentry/sentry_action.cc@77
PS5, Line 77:   // Any action must be initialized.
> Maybe this should CHECK fail?  It should be a bug if an uninitialized actio
Done



--
To view, visit http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/11656
To unsubscribe, visit http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/settings

Gerrit-Project: kudu
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Gerrit-Change-Id: Ib2e60b79a60fd791ec966f6271c676323bf74d49
Gerrit-Change-Number: 11656
Gerrit-PatchSet: 6
Gerrit-Owner: Hao Hao <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Andrew Wong <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Dan Burkert <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Hao Hao <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Kudu Jenkins
Gerrit-Reviewer: Tidy Bot
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2018 00:33:46 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes

Reply via email to