Alexey Serbin has posted comments on this change. ( 
http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/17694 )

Change subject: KUDU-2671 remove semantically duplicate range_hash_schemas
......................................................................


Patch Set 4:

(1 comment)

http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/17694/4/src/kudu/common/partition.cc
File src/kudu/common/partition.cc:

http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/17694/4/src/kudu/common/partition.cc@426
PS4, Line 426:   if (bounds_with_hash_schemas->empty()) {
             :     return Status::OK();
             :   }
> nit: Is this just for readability purposes to make this code more explicit?
As for the statement that the code below is skipped anyways, I'd suggest paying 
some attention to signed/unsigned implicit conversions.  In other words, try 
the code below:

#include <vector>                                              
#include <iostream>                                      
                                                   
using namespace std;                         
                                       
int main() {                     
  vector<int> m;           
  for (int i = 0; i < m.size() - 1; i++) {
    cout << "have fun" << endl;
  }                                                                             
                                                                          
  return 0;                                                         
}



--
To view, visit http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/17694
To unsubscribe, visit http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/settings

Gerrit-Project: kudu
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Gerrit-Change-Id: Icde3d0b0870fd3a3941fcc91602993ae7ad46266
Gerrit-Change-Number: 17694
Gerrit-PatchSet: 4
Gerrit-Owner: Alexey Serbin <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Alexey Serbin <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Andrew Wong <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Kudu Jenkins (120)
Gerrit-Reviewer: Mahesh Reddy <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2021 18:41:12 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes

Reply via email to