-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/34816/#review86051
-----------------------------------------------------------



src/tests/oversubscription_tests.cpp
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/34816/#comment137916>

    This looks weired to me since we are actually creating a 
TestResourceEstimator, but TypeParam == NoopResourceEstimator.
    
    IMO, all the tests so far in this file does not work for an arbitrary 
resource estimator (i.e., the expectations are tied with the estimator). As a 
result, using a typed test doesn't seem to make sense to me.
    
    Thoughts?


- Jie Yu


On June 1, 2015, 5:37 a.m., Bartek Plotka wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/34816/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated June 1, 2015, 5:37 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Jie Yu, Niklas Nielsen, Szymon Konefal, and Vinod 
> Kone.
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> This patch prepares Resource Estimator tests for modularized 
> ResourceEstimator.
> 
> It includes:
> 1. Made oversubscription_test to be typed_test.
> 2. TestResourceEstimator changed to be a templated MockResourceEstimator with 
> mocked methods - to inject resources and test plumbing between RE and Slave.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/tests/mesos.hpp ac986a0687a576a0bd5693c82b3c7d543aaa956b 
>   src/tests/oversubscription_tests.cpp 
> ea5857cb579aa904fd05530684bdde51a0b3f27f 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/34816/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make check
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Bartek Plotka
> 
>

Reply via email to