> On Sept. 29, 2015, 12:47 a.m., Ben Mahler wrote:
> > 3rdparty/libprocess/src/socket.cpp, lines 42-44
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/38809/diff/2/?file=1086106#file1086106line42>
> >
> >     Just as an aside, it's unfortunate the caller has to do this, we should 
> > consider doing the same thing that is done in os/posix/open.hpp with 
> > O_CLOEXEC:
> >     
> >     
> > https://github.com/apache/mesos/blob/5aa050bfaa7338b010b1a522406bde0f15015259/3rdparty/libprocess/3rdparty/stout/include/stout/os/posix/open.hpp#L33

I actually think this is not too bad -- a very staightforward if-else. 

I can probably break it up and save one network::socket call -- not sure if 
that's worth the added complexity, but I can do it in another patch if you'd 
like to see that?


- Chi


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/38809/#review100909
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Sept. 29, 2015, 6:11 p.m., Chi Zhang wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/38809/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Sept. 29, 2015, 6:11 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos and Ben Mahler.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-3519
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-3519
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> socket: refactor to use Option and fix file descriptor leaks.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   3rdparty/libprocess/include/process/socket.hpp 817cb37 
>   3rdparty/libprocess/src/socket.cpp 5879423 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/38809/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make check
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Chi Zhang
> 
>

Reply via email to