> On Sept. 25, 2015, 10:52 p.m., Ben Mahler wrote:
> > 3rdparty/libprocess/include/process/http.hpp, lines 59-60
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/38416/diff/3/?file=1084843#file1084843line59>
> >
> >     How about just status()?
> >     
> >     We can also avoid Option here by just returning the number value with 
> > no message? That seems cleaner?

Not sure how this is useful if it only returns the number value?


- Timothy


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/38416/#review100711
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Sept. 25, 2015, 10:38 p.m., Timothy Chen wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/38416/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Sept. 25, 2015, 10:38 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Anand Mazumdar, Ben Mahler, Jie Yu, Jojy Varghese, 
> and Jiang Yan Xu.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-3429
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-3429
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Allow HTTP response codes to be checked with code.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   3rdparty/libprocess/include/process/http.hpp 
> fbd6cf7967173495875a8ea90ed28ade88b982a2 
>   3rdparty/libprocess/src/decoder.hpp 
> 67a5135f302153e376e8dfe8db82aa0b15449389 
>   3rdparty/libprocess/src/http.cpp 9ad613a16c379b6d76a9a0f8d6160fe23a182fd4 
>   3rdparty/libprocess/src/process.cpp 
> 4afa30569b4d235637b49a624602e6b199c32e0e 
>   3rdparty/libprocess/src/tests/benchmarks.cpp 
> 97c81b8e61a75771e5bf7d46505cec4e0c0f404a 
>   3rdparty/libprocess/src/tests/http_tests.cpp 
> d0b9399d38fa284466a012a21080b1d9007af98b 
>   3rdparty/libprocess/src/tests/process_tests.cpp 
> 1023500ac2e3c55be955c4686e7f720eba6b4cc9 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/38416/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Timothy Chen
> 
>

Reply via email to