> On Oct. 25, 2015, 1:39 p.m., Guangya Liu wrote: > > src/master/allocator/mesos/hierarchical.cpp, line 1035 > > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/39401/diff/5/?file=1105060#file1105060line1035> > > > > I know that we have design to exclue the reserved resource from quota, > > but why not include the current role's reserved as available? > > Alexander Rukletsov wrote: > If you mean dynamically reserved resources than yes, we can do that. If > you mean statically reserved than nope, we decided not to conflate them with > quota. > > Guangya Liu wrote: > I mean both static and dynamic reservation, I think that both of the > reservations for one role should be included in the role's quota, can you > pleaes clairify why not include static reservation in one role's quota?
Does [this](https://docs.google.com/document/d/16iRNmziasEjVOblYp5bbkeBZ7pnjNlaIzPQqMTHQ-9I/edit?pli=1#heading=h.xumvch9xiky2) answer your question? - Alexander ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/39401/#review103954 ----------------------------------------------------------- On Oct. 29, 2015, 7:29 p.m., Alexander Rukletsov wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/39401/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated Oct. 29, 2015, 7:29 p.m.) > > > Review request for mesos, Bernd Mathiske, Joerg Schad, and Joris Van > Remoortere. > > > Bugs: MESOS-3718 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-3718 > > > Repository: mesos > > > Description > ------- > > See summary. > > > Diffs > ----- > > src/master/allocator/mesos/hierarchical.cpp > f4e4a123d3da0442e8b0b0ad14d1ee760752ba36 > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/39401/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > make check (Mac OS X 10.10.4) > > > Thanks, > > Alexander Rukletsov > >
