> On Oct. 25, 2015, 1:39 p.m., Guangya Liu wrote:
> > src/master/allocator/mesos/hierarchical.cpp, line 1035
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/39401/diff/5/?file=1105060#file1105060line1035>
> >
> >     I know that we have design to exclue the reserved resource from quota, 
> > but why not include the current role's reserved as available?
> 
> Alexander Rukletsov wrote:
>     If you mean dynamically reserved resources than yes, we can do that. If 
> you mean statically reserved than nope, we decided not to conflate them with 
> quota.
> 
> Guangya Liu wrote:
>     I mean both static and dynamic reservation, I think that both of the 
> reservations for one role should be included in the role's quota, can you 
> pleaes clairify why not include static reservation in one role's quota?
> 
> Alexander Rukletsov wrote:
>     Does 
> [this](https://docs.google.com/document/d/16iRNmziasEjVOblYp5bbkeBZ7pnjNlaIzPQqMTHQ-9I/edit?pli=1#heading=h.xumvch9xiky2)
>  answer your question?
> 
> Guangya Liu wrote:
>     I see that the design document want to use the last one "Static 
> reservations are static (implicit) part of quota, operators cannot change 
> them via quota mechanisms.", my understanding is that the static reservations 
> will be treated as the implicit part of quota, right?

Yes, which means we do *not* take them into account in the quota part of the 
allocator, but we plan to show them in the quota `get` endpoint in order to 
help operators understand reservations.


- Alexander


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/39401/#review103954
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Nov. 5, 2015, 6:25 p.m., Alexander Rukletsov wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/39401/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Nov. 5, 2015, 6:25 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Bernd Mathiske, Joerg Schad, Joris Van Remoortere, 
> and Joseph Wu.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-3718
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-3718
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> See summary.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/master/allocator/mesos/hierarchical.cpp 
> f4e4a123d3da0442e8b0b0ad14d1ee760752ba36 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/39401/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make check (Mac OS X 10.10.4)
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Alexander Rukletsov
> 
>

Reply via email to